TY - JOUR
T1 - Key concepts and a world-wide look at plant recruitment networks
AU - Alcántara, Julio M.
AU - Verdú, Miguel
AU - Garrido, José L.
AU - Montesinos-Navarro, Alicia
AU - Aizen, Marcelo A.
AU - Alifriqui, Mohamed
AU - Allen, David
AU - Al-Namazi, Ali A.
AU - Armas, Cristina
AU - Bastida, Jesús M.
AU - Bellido, Tono
AU - Paterno, Gustavo Brant
AU - Briceño, Herbert
AU - Camargo de Oliveira, Ricardo A.
AU - Campoy, Josefina G.
AU - Chaieb, Ghassen
AU - Chu, Chengjin
AU - Constantinou, Elena
AU - Delalandre, Léo
AU - Duarte, Milen
AU - Faife-Cabrera, Michel
AU - Fazlioglu, Fatih
AU - Fernando, Edwino S.
AU - Flores, Joel
AU - Flores-Olvera, Hilda
AU - Fodor, Ecaterina
AU - Ganade, Gislene
AU - Garcia, Maria B.
AU - García-Fayos, Patricio
AU - Gavini, Sabrina S.
AU - Goberna, Marta
AU - Gómez-Aparicio, Lorena
AU - González-Pendás, Enrique
AU - González-Robles, Ana
AU - İpekdal, Kahraman
AU - Kikvidze, Zaal
AU - Ledo, Alicia
AU - Lendínez, Sandra
AU - Liu, Hanlun
AU - Lloret, Francisco
AU - López, Ramiro P.
AU - López-García, Álvaro
AU - Lortie, Christopher J.
AU - Losapio, Gianalberto
AU - Lutz, James A.
AU - Máliš, František
AU - Manzaneda, Antonio J.
AU - Marcilio-Silva, Vinicius
AU - Michalet, Richard
AU - Molina-Venegas, Rafael
AU - Navarro-Cano, José A.
AU - Novotny, Vojtech
AU - Olesen, Jens M.
AU - Ortiz-Brunel, Juan P.
AU - Pajares-Murgó, Mariona
AU - Perea, Antonio J.
AU - Pérez-Hernández, Vidal
AU - Pérez-Navarro, María Ángeles
AU - Pistón, Nuria
AU - Prieto, Iván
AU - Prieto-Rubio, Jorge
AU - Pugnaire, Francisco I.
AU - Ramírez, Nelson
AU - Retuerto, Rubén
AU - Rey, Pedro J.
AU - Rodriguez-Ginart, Daniel A.
AU - Sánchez-Martín, Ricardo
AU - Tavşanoğlu, Çağatay
AU - Tedoradze, Giorgi
AU - Tercero-Araque, Amanda
AU - Tielbörger, Katja
AU - Touzard, Blaise
AU - Tüfekcioğlu, İrem
AU - Turkis, Sevda
AU - Usero, Francisco M.
AU - Usta-Baykal, Nurbahar
AU - Valiente-Banuet, Alfonso
AU - Vargas-Colin, Alexa
AU - Vogiatzakis, Ioannis
AU - Zamora, Regino
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Biological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Plant–plant interactions are major determinants of the dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems. There is a long tradition in the study of these interactions, their mechanisms and their consequences using experimental, observational and theoretical approaches. Empirical studies overwhelmingly focus at the level of species pairs or small sets of species. Although empirical data on these interactions at the community level are scarce, such studies have gained pace in the last decade. Studying plant–plant interactions at the community level requires knowledge of which species interact with which others, so an ecological networks approach must be incorporated into the basic toolbox of plant community ecology. The concept of recruitment networks (RNs) provides an integrative framework and new insights for many topics in the field of plant community ecology. RNs synthesise the set of canopy–recruit interactions in a local plant assemblage. Canopy–recruit interactions describe which (“canopy”) species allow the recruitment of other species in their vicinity and how. Here we critically review basic concepts of ecological network theory as they apply to RNs. We use RecruitNet, a recently published worldwide data set of canopy–recruit interactions, to describe RN patterns emerging at the interaction, species, and community levels, and relate them to different abiotic gradients. Our results show that RNs can be sampled with high accuracy. The studies included in RecruitNet show a very high mean network completeness (95%), indicating that undetected canopy–recruit pairs must be few and occur very infrequently. Across 351,064 canopy–recruit pairs analysed, the effect of the interaction on recruitment was neutral in an average of 69% of the interactions per community, but the remaining interactions were positive (i.e. facilitative) five times more often than negative (i.e. competitive), and positive interactions had twice the strength of negative ones. Moreover, the frequency and strength of facilitation increases along a climatic aridity gradient worldwide, so the demography of plant communities is increasingly strongly dependent on facilitation as aridity increases. At network level, species can be ascribed to four functional types depending on their position in the network: core, satellite, strict transients and disturbance-dependent transients. This functional structure can allow a rough estimation of which species are more likely to persist. In RecruitNet communities, this functional structure most often departs from random null model expectation and could allow on average the persistence of 77% of the species in a local community. The functional structure of RNs also varies along the aridity gradient, but differently in shrubland than in forest communities. This variation suggests an increase in the probability of species persistence with aridity in forests, while such probability remains roughly constant along the gradient in shrublands. The different functional structure of RNs between forests and shrublands could contribute to explaining their co-occurrence as alternative stable states of the vegetation under the same climatic conditions. This review is not exhaustive of all the topics that can be addressed using the framework of RNs, but instead aims to present some of the interesting insights that it can bring to the field of plant community ecology.
AB - Plant–plant interactions are major determinants of the dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems. There is a long tradition in the study of these interactions, their mechanisms and their consequences using experimental, observational and theoretical approaches. Empirical studies overwhelmingly focus at the level of species pairs or small sets of species. Although empirical data on these interactions at the community level are scarce, such studies have gained pace in the last decade. Studying plant–plant interactions at the community level requires knowledge of which species interact with which others, so an ecological networks approach must be incorporated into the basic toolbox of plant community ecology. The concept of recruitment networks (RNs) provides an integrative framework and new insights for many topics in the field of plant community ecology. RNs synthesise the set of canopy–recruit interactions in a local plant assemblage. Canopy–recruit interactions describe which (“canopy”) species allow the recruitment of other species in their vicinity and how. Here we critically review basic concepts of ecological network theory as they apply to RNs. We use RecruitNet, a recently published worldwide data set of canopy–recruit interactions, to describe RN patterns emerging at the interaction, species, and community levels, and relate them to different abiotic gradients. Our results show that RNs can be sampled with high accuracy. The studies included in RecruitNet show a very high mean network completeness (95%), indicating that undetected canopy–recruit pairs must be few and occur very infrequently. Across 351,064 canopy–recruit pairs analysed, the effect of the interaction on recruitment was neutral in an average of 69% of the interactions per community, but the remaining interactions were positive (i.e. facilitative) five times more often than negative (i.e. competitive), and positive interactions had twice the strength of negative ones. Moreover, the frequency and strength of facilitation increases along a climatic aridity gradient worldwide, so the demography of plant communities is increasingly strongly dependent on facilitation as aridity increases. At network level, species can be ascribed to four functional types depending on their position in the network: core, satellite, strict transients and disturbance-dependent transients. This functional structure can allow a rough estimation of which species are more likely to persist. In RecruitNet communities, this functional structure most often departs from random null model expectation and could allow on average the persistence of 77% of the species in a local community. The functional structure of RNs also varies along the aridity gradient, but differently in shrubland than in forest communities. This variation suggests an increase in the probability of species persistence with aridity in forests, while such probability remains roughly constant along the gradient in shrublands. The different functional structure of RNs between forests and shrublands could contribute to explaining their co-occurrence as alternative stable states of the vegetation under the same climatic conditions. This review is not exhaustive of all the topics that can be addressed using the framework of RNs, but instead aims to present some of the interesting insights that it can bring to the field of plant community ecology.
KW - canopy service
KW - ecological networks
KW - facilitation
KW - interaction strength
KW - plant–plant interactions
KW - recruitment niche
KW - replacement networks
KW - sapling bank
KW - stress gradient hypothesis
KW - strongly connected components
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85213423485&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/brv.13177
DO - 10.1111/brv.13177
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85213423485
SN - 1464-7931
JO - Biological Reviews
JF - Biological Reviews
ER -